Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whose ethics have been questioned for accepting gifts and luxury vacations and private jets from Republican donors, recused himself in October from a case involving John Eastman, a Trump legal adviser linked to a scheme to impeach the former vice president. Mike Pence Fails to Certify President Joe Biden's Election Victory

Now many Democratic congressmen They are demanding that Thomas refrain from speaking in the presidential immunity case implemented by former President Donald Trump.If it persists, it will not only allow the US president to commit crimes with impunity during his term, but also leave legal charges against Trump for crimes committed during his presidency without legal basis.

In a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts, Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, said that “justice will be served only if the case is tried by judges who are incapable of fair trial.”

Blumenthal called on Roberts to take appropriate steps to ensure Thomas recuses himself from considering the case, reminding the Supreme Court chief justice that “no action could be more serious than an attempt to undermine our sacred electoral process.”

Alleged ethical misconduct and his closeness to donors and figures in the Republican Party aren't the only things that worry those calling for Thomas' ouster. There is also the concern that His wife, Ginny Thomas, was a conservative activist involved in an election tampering plot..

Ginny Thomas called on legislatures in states like Arizona and Wisconsin to reverse the presidential election results in their states. The Washington Post White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has repeatedly pressed him to continue his efforts to disrupt the 2020 presidential election.

According to copies of those messages obtained by The Washington Post and CBS News, the pressure came from Thomas' wife through a series of text exchanges sent in the critical weeks of the vote.

“Ms. Thomas's close contacts with senior Trump administration officials regarding the overturning of the 2020 election results, subject to litigation, certainly create circumstances that call into question Thomas's impartiality,” he warned. .

Trump on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to reject special counsel Jack Smith's request to immediately review his presidential immunity after the 2024 presidential election.

The court, which agreed only to consider the case, is yet to decide whether to rule on the matter.

On January 6, 2021, Trump faces a criminal trial in federal trial court in Washington, D.C., on four counts of conspiracy to defraud the government, voter disenfranchisement, and corruptly obstruct the certification of election votes.

Trump's lawyers are appealing a decision by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tanya Sudkan, who denied a request to throw out Trump's trial for election meddling.

In his ruling, Sutgen rejected the presidential immunity doctrine for Trump's defense, pointing out that The presidency does not confer upon its holder the “divine right of kings to escape the same criminal responsibility as governing their fellow citizens.” Reaffirms the principle of American law that no citizen is above the law.

“The Court cannot conclude that our Constitution provides absolute immunity for any federal crimes committed by former presidents while they were in office,” Sutgen added.

“There are many unanswered questions about the judge and his family's relationship with the Trump administration, and I believe that in the interest of justice, Thomas should recuse himself,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. to the mountain.