fast food chain Subway He’ll have to explain to a California court the composition of one of his famous sandwiches after two residents reported that tuna They are already using it as an ingredient It is not a fishAccording to EFE.
In their complaint, they claimed that what Subway declares as “tuna” is in fact “A. A mixture of different concoctions Which does not form tuna and has been mixed to mimic its appearance. “
The attorney for the prosecution said that such a claim, which the company categorically denied, came after conducting “laboratory tests that did not find the remains of tuna fish in the samples,” which were trying to determine the material made from them.
The suit was filed in a California court last week, but came to light after the Washington Post reported about it.
After the uproar the news caused, since Subway is a very popular chain in the United States with a presence in other countries, a company spokesperson described the accusations as “untrue”.
“Simply There is no truth On the complaint charges that were filed in California. “Subway delivers 100% cooked tuna to its restaurants, which is mixed with mayonnaise and used in the fresh sandwiches, wraps and salads that our customers enjoy,” the company said in a statement.
In addition, the company deemed the complaint would negatively impact sandwich chain franchise stores and smallholders per business.
It may interest you
However, the attorney who brought the lawsuit, Alex Brown, insisted that no person responsible for Subway had identified the composition of the component when contacted to ask “what they sold”, at You don’t find traces of “tuna.” Or fish protein. “
This is not the first time that an ingredient in Subway has been questioned, as the Irish Supreme Court ruled in October that bread on menus could not be considered “technical bread” due to its high sugar content.