Cruz Azul complains that the arbitrator did not review the VAR in the second penalty
Cruz Azul, through his Twitter account, blamed the whistleblower for not reconsidering the scam on Sambuvesa
Cruz Azul, through his social networks, complained about the second fine against Marco Antonio Artis Nava. However, one researcher is Felipe Ramos Risso ESPN, Both penalties were considered better in favor of Toluca.
“According to the arbitrator,” false “unworthy of reconsideration”, wrote Cruz Azul on his social media. Minutes after scoring the second penalty against the central whistle machine.
The action was delivered in the 48th minute, at that point Rubens Sambuvesa Entered the area and knocked down Roberto Alvarado. Although the play was not clear, Marco Antonio Artis Nava allowed a penalty without having to go to the VAR screen to reconsider it.
According to the arbitrator, the “deficit” is not even eligible for reconsideration.
– Blue Cross (ruCruzAzul) May 13, 2021
On the other hand, former referee and analyst Felipe Ramos Risso ESPN, The decision of the Central Whistle is considered to be correct: “The fine in favor of Toluca on Sambouza was well allowed.”
Ramos Risso also approved the first fine allowed by Artis Nava, which happened on the 24th Alexis Canello of Puntarenas Collided with Juan Escobar: “The fine in favor of Toluca is well allowed,” the expert wrote ESPN.