Election Ban: Barbara de Rigel, Lamda Garcia and other celebrities and influencers broke the law | Federal elections | Mexico | MX nnda nnlt | Fame
Over the weekend it happened Federal elections in Mexico What surprised social network users the most was seeing different artists and actors promoting the vote for the Green Environmental Party of Mexico (PVEM) and thus violating the electoral ban.
This action was completely criticized by everyone, because in addition to receiving money to promote a political party, they also did it at the wrong time which led to them violating Mexican laws, since it is strictly forbidden that such missionary acts be carried out three days before or during the vote.
The authorities confirmed that about 80 public figures violated the electoral ban, and everything is under investigation. Here we tell you the name of some of the celebrities who would have joined this proselytizing campaign and violated Mexican laws a day after the vote.
Artists and Influencers Who Violated the Electoral Veda
The script outline was the same. They performed a typical question-and-answer dynamic, when someone asks them by chance first. If they voteصوت This Sunday, June 6 and at the end of the day. In this sense, they confirm their participation in the election day. They are calling on the population to do the same, and finally indicated that their vote would be for the “Green Party” because of their “environmental” proposals.
In the face of this situation, it has begun to spread on the networks and through the Twitter account what’s fake @What is counterfeit Videos that serve as proof of the characters’ admiration Carla Diaz and Regina Morgoya (both members of the JNS group), Barbara de Rigel, Brenda Zambrano, Celia Laura, Daniel Bautista, Danilo Carrera, Eleazar Gomez, Eugenio Celler, Gabriel Soto, Verca, Gretel Valdes, Isabel Mado, Carime Pedro Lamda Garcia, Laura J, Manele, Miguel Martinez, Raul Arraiza, Pedro Prieto, Brando Beniche, Raquel Pegora, Romina Marcos, Sharice Seid, Sherlyn Gonzalez, Among many others, they influenced the publication of their voting intention.
How much did you pay to promote PVEM?
As mentioned in the aforementioned account and on Instagram @chicapicosa2, he said that the celebrity and entertainer will be sponsored by agencies dedicated to digital marketing, and it should be noted that the payments for each will be there From 10 thousand to 200 thousand pesosDepending on its influence and the number of followers.
What is an electoral ban?
The Electoral Vida It is a period of time when any kind of propaganda is eliminated so that people can think about their vote without being surrounded by propaganda and can make the decision freely.
According to Article 251 of the General Law on Electoral Institutions and Procedures, three days before the elections and until the official closing date of the polling, “it is prohibited to publish or publish the results of polls or opinion polls by any means intended to disseminate the electoral preferences of citizens”
The electoral ban includes political parties, groups, candidates, citizens, election observers, authorities, public officials, notaries, foreigners, and radio and television franchisees.
What can not be taken during veda elections?
- Parties and candidates may not distribute propaganda or organize rallies.
- They cannot call to vote or request a vote.
- They cannot publish opinion polls or preferred election results.
- They cannot carry out campaign and advocacy activities.
- All kinds of electoral and government advertising are prohibited.
- No rallies may be held for or against parties or candidates.
- You cannot publish or submit annual business reports.
- On election day there should be no election advertising near the polling stations.
- Candidates must comment on any advertising style on social networks and the Internet.
What are the penalties for violating the electoral veda?
Citizens who do not respect Electoral Vida They may be denounced for violating election law and punished, if the judiciary proves wrong.
Article 140 of the National Electoral Law states that the penalty for “deceiving another person to vote in a certain way or to abstain from doing so” is imprisonment from two months to two years.
Whereas, anyone who “uses means that tend to violate the secrecy of the ballot” (Article 141) is liable to imprisonment for up to 3 years.
In this case, the Electoral Litigation Technical Unit of the National Electoral Institute must consolidate the file of the investigation of the crime committed and hand it over to the Specialized Regional Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary (TEPJF), which will assign a sentence to the Green Party ecologist from Mexico (PVEM).
The authority will also be responsible for clarifying whether the influencers have committed a crime, for which they can be punished.